MMGW = Liberalism

I tried to cut back on the Man Made Global Warming (MMGW) articles until I realized that MMGW is inseparable from liberalism today. MMGW is the Trojan horse that liberalism is using to advance their discredited agenda, so MMGW is involved in everything liberal.

So, we will do some posts showing that even if MMGW were real and were stopable, the left is not interested in real world solutions to this "problem". Today's editorial in the Wall Street Journal is an excellent example of the frustration people have with the enviro-weenies that run the MMGW complex.

Hopefully a technological solution will be forthcoming, but meanwhile we will need to continue expanding our energy generation to meet our nation's economic needs. Today we generate one million megawatts of electricity, 52% of it from coal, 36% from gas and nuclear power, 11% from petroleum-fired and hydro-electric plants, and just 1% from wind and solar sources. According to future projections we will need another 100,000 megawatts--10% more energy--by 2020. Just a little of that will come from the congressional preference for "renewable energy," so we will need energy from all our existing sources for many decades.

Neither Kyoto nor Bali will solve our global energy emission problems. According to a Princeton University study a few year ago the world could hold its carbon dioxide emissions flat if 700 nuclear power plants were built around the globe, for they do not increase global warming. But they are not favored by the climate establishment, and so are not a part of the Bali solution.

Over 6o% of our power could be emissions free! There would be no increase in emissions with the global construction of nuclear plants. Here we have an answer that works with modern technology and the left has no interest in it. This is all I need to know about Al Gore and his cronies. They don't want to solve MMGW, they want to control the world.